Compliance

When to Use Outsourced Compliance and MLRO Support

A practical view on outsourced oversight without losing regulatory credibility.

December 22, 2025 · 1 min read · Harlyz Advisory

Why firms outsource early

Early-stage and newly licensed firms often need experienced compliance leadership without adding fixed overhead. Outsourced support can be effective when governance and accountability are clear.

What regulators expect

  • Clear oversight responsibilities and reporting lines
  • Evidence that the board receives regular compliance updates
  • Documented escalation paths for incidents and SARs

A balanced model

Outsourcing works best when combined with internal control owners who can provide evidence and respond quickly to regulator requests.

Related resources

Related services, industries, and jurisdictions

Continue with the core guidance pages referenced in this insight.

Related services

Outsourced Compliance & MLRO

Ongoing compliance oversight, reporting, and MLRO support for firms that need experienced coverage without building a full internal team.

AML/CFT Program Design

Risk-based AML frameworks, monitoring standards, and escalation playbooks built for regulatory scrutiny and operational efficiency.

Legal Advisory & Regulatory Compliance

We translate regulator expectations into clear policies, control ownership, and reporting routines that teams can execute and defend.

UAE Free Zone Company Setup & Visa Assistance

We guide free zone selection, company formation, and visa processing with a clear documentation and timeline plan.

Related industries

Fintech Companies

From licensing strategy to operational controls, we help fintechs scale without compliance surprises.

Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Regulatory alignment for virtual asset service providers across licensing, AML, custody controls, and reporting.

Related jurisdictions